Basic Docs
gitworkflow

Git Branching Strategies

Compare Git Flow, GitHub Flow, and Trunk-Based Development to pick the right branching model.

Three Popular Strategies

Git Flow
Structured model with long-lived branches. Best for versioned software with scheduled releases.
GitHub Flow
Lightweight: branch, PR, merge. Best for teams that ship continuously to a single environment.
Trunk-Based Development
Everyone commits to main frequently. Best for high-velocity teams with strong CI/CD and feature flags.

Git Flow

Git Flow introduces two permanent branches — main and develop — plus short-lived feature, release, and hotfix branches. Changes flow upward through develop before reaching main. It gives teams explicit control over what ships in each release.

main
develop
feature/*
develop
release/*
main
!Watch out
Git Flow adds overhead. Long-lived branches accumulate merge conflicts, and the ceremony around releases can slow down smaller teams. Consider simpler strategies unless you truly need parallel version maintenance.
Git Flow Release Cycle
Feature Branch
Develop new feature isolated from main codebase
Develop
Merge completed features for integration testing
Release Branch
Freeze features, fix bugs, prepare for release
Main
Tag and ship the production release
Hotfix
Critical patch branched from and merged back to main

GitHub Flow

GitHub Flow keeps it simple: branch off main, commit your changes, open a pull request, review, and merge. There is no develop branch — main is always deployable. This works well when you deploy on every merge.

main
feature-branch
Pull Request
main
Deploy
Good default
GitHub Flow is a solid default for most teams. It enforces code review via PRs, keeps history clean, and avoids the complexity of multi-branch models. Start here unless you have a specific reason to use something else.

Trunk-Based Development

Developers integrate into main (the trunk) at least once a day, using short-lived branches or committing directly. Large features are hidden behind feature flags rather than long feature branches. This minimizes merge conflicts and keeps the integration loop tight.

main
short-lived branch
main (CI runs)
Deploy
iPrerequisites
Trunk-Based Development requires a robust CI pipeline, fast automated tests, and disciplined use of feature flags. Without these in place, it can destabilize main frequently.

Choosing a Strategy

StrategyBest Suited For
Git FlowLarge teams, versioned products, infrequent scheduled releases
GitHub FlowSmall-to-mid teams, continuous deployment, single production environment
Trunk-Based DevelopmentHigh-velocity teams, mature CI/CD, strong automated test coverage
5
Git Flow
branch types: main, develop, feature, release, hotfix
2
GitHub Flow
branch types: main + short-lived feature branches
1+
Trunk-Based
main trunk with optional short-lived branches
Built: 4/8/2026, 12:01:11 PM